What is the true cost of repealing the death tax on agriculture?

“We want permanency.”

Congress is getting to work on a tax package that would extend the 2017 tax cuts.

Some ag industry members advocate for the death tax as a possible tax cut and ask for a permanent exemption for farmers and ranchers. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association says this would protect thousands of farms.

“This is a country that is custom-built for agriculture. Everyone else in the world is jealous of what we have and because of the quality of what we have, and we’re really good at using it. The problem is as that value goes up if the tax code doesn’t reflect that, then you’re going to have a lot of people that are caught up in it. That’s one of the things we found in our tax survey is that if that death tax rolls back, we have 61% of those 1,200 survey respondents that are going to suffer from this, and that’s reflective on the whole industry. This is not a handful of people that are going to get caught up in it. If this prevents back to that $5,000,000 adjusted for inflation, if it goes back then that’s going to hit a ton of people,” according to Kent Bacus.

Bacus says that a permanent repeal of death taxes on ag land has strong support in both the House and Senate, but he believes that it is going to come down to crunching the numbers.

“We want permanency in this, but as far as, you know, Congress’s ability to pay for all of it— we don’t know. It’s still a little early to tell. I think, there’s broad support for having permanent repeal of this, but you know, as they get to those backrooms and they crunch numbers, we don’t know what that outcome is going to look like,” he notes. “But that’s why we have to come down so hard on this. We can’t start compromising on the get-go. Otherwise, you’re never going to achieve. So, we’ve taken that firm position that we need full permanent repeal of the death tax. We need this for future generations.”

He expects Congress to send a package to President Trump by the end of May, but he says that there could be some hang-ups in the Senate.

Related Stories
Both Congressional Ag Committees took up the bill over the summer, but there’s no word on when the Senate could move forward; it does expire on September 30.
Lewie Pugh, with the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report with his insights on the incident and a deeper dive into the issues at hand.
As the Trump Administration seeks out new global trade partnerships, Congress is considering more support for farmers, which comes as the Federal Reserve warns that farmers need a safety net.
Ag Secretary Brooke Rollins will travel to Europe and Asia to seek new trade partnerships for U.S. crops after China reduced imports due to tariffs.
The $221 million will help farmers and ranchers cover losses from Hurricane Helene that USDA programs didn’t cover. They’ll focus on infrastructure, markets, timber, and future economic losses.
Tom Peterson with the New Mexico Cattle Growers Association says taxpayers are “unfortunate casualties” of this overlay now that the Mexican wolf population is stable under ESA guidelines.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Dr. Beetham outlined the background of the EU’s decision to modernize seed regulations and where the process stands today, and its impact on global agriculture and food security.
“It, all of a sudden, says that tracking and fighting hunger is not a priority, apparently, at the federal level.”
Colin Reilly with Connected Nation joined RFD-TV News to explain how the tool works and why it’s an important step in bridging the digital divide.
Jeremy Kelly explains how Darling Ingredients’ mission aligns with FFA’s values and why investing in future ag leaders is so important.
Molly Ball joins us to talk about the upcoming FFA Convention & Expo and dish about the latest episode of “Dirt Diaries: The FarmHER + RanchHER Podcast.”