Bipartisan Effort Aims to Block Federal Hemp Ban, Give States Regulatory Power

Led by Sen. Rand Paul, lawmakers aim to prevent a November federal hemp ban, advocating for state control as farmers face planting uncertainties.

Angela_Dawson_21_07_31_USA_MN_Hemp_Cooperative_0G4A0672.jpg

The Minnesota Hemp Cooperative

FarmHER, Inc.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — Right now in Washington, there is an ongoing bipartisan push to stop a planned national ban on certain hemp products, set to take effect in November. Lawmakers warn the move could have a major impact on farmers and the multibillion-dollar hemp industry.

The proposal would allow states to opt out of the federal ban if they enforce strict safety rules, including limits on synthetic hemp compounds. Supporters say the goal is to protect consumers while preserving a rapidly growing market, but uncertainty is already affecting decisions on the farm.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is making the case for producers, arguing that states should have the authority to regulate hemp rather than a one-size-fits-all federal approach.

“No one in Washington discussed the issue. There was no investigation, no hearings,” Paul said. “When Kentucky passed it, they studied it for six months. They decided they wanted to keep it out of the hands of children, regulate the age, and punish stores that sell to underage minors. They handled it in a thoughtful manner, and we ought to let that become the law rather than have people in Washington who never studied the issue make the final decision.”

Paul says the timing of the proposed ban is creating real challenges for farmers, who must decide months in advance whether to plant hemp.

“It’s difficult for those in the hemp business right now because it’s a crop — it has to be planted,” he said. “If it’s going to be made illegal in November, farmers are wondering whether they should plant it this year. They’ve probably already had to make that decision.”

He added that he is working across the aisle with a Democratic senator to ensure states that already regulate hemp can continue to do so, even if federal restrictions move forward.

The proposal is expected to be part of broader discussions around the next farm bill, as lawmakers weigh shifting more authority over hemp regulation to the states while the federal debate continues.

For now, producers are left navigating uncertainty — balancing market opportunity against the risk of sudden regulatory changes.

Related Stories
Senator Roger Marshall spoke with RFD-TV’s own Suzanne Alexander on his thoughts on the hearing, getting milk back into schools, and how her background will help her in this role.
Ray Starling served as Sonny Perdue’s Chief of Staff and was an ag advisor during Trump’s first term. He weighs in on Trump’s ag secretary pick, Brooke Rollins of Texas.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

National Sorghum Producers CEO Tim Lust said farmers face a challenging year with strong supply, murky trade conditions, and uncertain access to their largest market: China.
RFD-TV Markets Expert Tony St. James breaks down the state of agribusiness and harvest progress across the U.S. for the week of Monday, September 15, 2025.
Missouri Cattle RanchHER Alda Owen joined us on Monday’s Market Day Report to talk about the all-new episode of FarmHER + RanchHER, which premieres on Thursday, Sept. 19!
U.S. trade talks with China resume, but meat industry leaders say dealing with shifting demand and market uncertainty is nothing new in this side of the ag sector.
Tariffs are pushing up input costs, with fertilizer prices rising $100 per ton and machinery costs climbing due to steel and parts duties.
Year-round sales of E-15 are another major topic on Capitol Hill, which, according to Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE), is one issue up for debate this session with significant bipartisan support.