China’s Cotton Buying Shift Reshapes Export Outlook Ahead

China may no longer serve as a consistent anchor market for U.S. cotton exports. Lewis Williamson of HTS Commodities joined us to discuss the factors influencing planting decisions, river conditions, and what producers are considering as they finalize acreage plans for the season.

Cotton Plant. Cotton picker working in a large cotton field_Photo by MagioreStockStudio via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo by MagioreStockStudio via Adobe Stock

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (RFD NEWS) — U.S. cotton markets are adjusting to a major shift as China sharply reduces purchases, raising questions about whether the world’s largest textile producer will remain a dependable export customer. The change carries significant implications for producers because more than 80 percent of U.S. cotton production relies on export demand.

University of Tennessee economist Dr. Andrew Muhammad reports that China’s imports of U.S. cotton fell dramatically in 2025, with purchase value dropping from $1.5 billion to $0.2 billion — an 85 percent decline — while volumes fell from 0.8 million metric tons to 0.1 million metric tons. China had accounted for nearly 30 percent of U.S. cotton exports between 2020 and 2024, making the contraction especially impactful for global trade flows.

The decline reflects more than trade tensions. China has expanded domestic cotton production, reduced reliance on imports, and drawn down state stockpiles accumulated over the past decade. Domestic output has risen more than 30 percent since 2021, allowing its textile sector to rely increasingly on local fiber supplies.

Operationally, U.S. exporters redirected shipments elsewhere. Cotton exports to non-China destinations increased 32 percent in value and 51 percent in volume in 2025, partially offsetting the loss of Chinese demand.

Across all suppliers — including Brazil, India, and Australia — shipments to China declined sharply, signaling a broader structural shift rather than a U.S.-specific trade dispute.

Farm-Level Takeaway: China may no longer serve as a consistent anchor market for U.S. cotton exports.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist

Farmers are navigating weather volatility and tight margins as early planting decisions take shape across the country. From geopolitical developments to fluctuating input costs, several factors are influencing the spring outlook.

Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities joined us on Tuesday’s Market Day Report to share what he is monitoring as planting season approaches.

In his interview with RFD NEWS, Williamson said market participants are closely watching global events, input pricing trends, and overall demand signals as growers weigh risk and opportunity heading into spring. Weather remains a key factor, with conditions varying widely across production regions.

Despite winter snowfall in parts of the country, drought concerns persist in some areas, continuing to impact river levels along the Mississippi River system. Williamson discussed how transportation challenges and water levels could influence basis levels and grain movement as the season progresses.

He also shared what he’s hearing from producers regarding potential acreage shifts, noting that planting decisions are being shaped by margin pressure, crop insurance considerations, and overall market signals.

Related Stories
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
From rising trade tensions in Europe to a pending Supreme Court decision on tariffs and shifting demand from China, global trade policy spearheaded by President Donald Trump continues to shape the outlook for U.S. agriculture—adding uncertainty as farmers navigate another volatile year.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.
Freight volatility and route selection remain critical to soybean export margins and competitiveness.
Strong balance sheets still matter, but liquidity, planning, and lender relationships are critical as ag credit tightens, according to analysis from AgAmerica Lending.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Stable small business confidence supports rural economies, but lingering cost pressures and uncertainty continue to shape farm-country decision-making.
Cotton acres slipping as competing crops gain ground.
Rising Chinese feed output — especially for swine — signals sustained demand for protein meals and feed inputs, even when meat production growth appears modest.
Ethanol output is improving, but weak domestic demand and export headwinds temper optimism about corn demand. Renewable Fuels Association President & CEO Geoff Cooper discusses the latest developments on Federal approval of year-round E15.
The National Farm Machinery Show is underway in Louisville, Kentucky, bringing together the latest in agricultural equipment, technology, and innovation. Here are some highlights from the trade show floor so far!
RealAg Radio host Shaun Haney discusses how AI integration in grocery retail could impact farmers and the broader food supply chain.