Kansas Senator Jerry Moran Highlights Food for Peace Legacy and Farm Bill Priorities

Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas joins us to discuss the Food for Peace program’s Kansas roots, its place in the Farm Bill, and the importance of the USDA’s visit to the state.

MANHATTAN, KAN. (RFD NEWS) — U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary Luke Lindberg is in Kansas this week, touring agricultural operations and holding discussions focused on the Food for Peace program, which originally began in the state.

U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) joined us on Wednesday’s Market Day Report to discuss Lindberg’s visit, the future of Food for Peace, and ongoing Farm Bill negotiations in the Senate. He also discussed efforts to permanently transfer the Food for Peace program to the USDA through the Farm Bill, following its temporary relocation from the State Department during the Trump administration.

In his conversation with RFD News, Moran highlighted Kansas’ long-standing connection to the Food for Peace program, explaining that the initiative was originally inspired by a northwest Kansas farmer who questioned why surplus grain could not be used to help feed hungry people around the world.

“Kansas has a special place in its heart for food and hunger programs, including particularly Food for Peace,” Moran told RFD News. “A farmer in northwest Kansas, in Cheyenne County, a number of years ago, had an idea at a Farm Bureau meeting and said, ‘What are we doing with this grain on the ground when there are hungry people around the world?’”

Moran noted that the program was later created under President Dwight D. Eisenhower and supported by Kansas Senator Bob Dole.

“The Food for Peace program went away in the early days of the Trump administration,” he said. “It was eliminated by the State Department. USDA picked up that program, and we’ve introduced legislation — Senator Hyde-Smith and Congressman Tracey Mann — to transfer what’s been temporarily transferred to USDA and make that permanent,” Moran said. “We want the secretary to see what the capabilities are, and I know he knows so much about this. We have a strong advocate for feeding the world for the moral and economic reasons that this matters to Kansas and American agriculture.”

He also explained why he believes the initiative is important not only from a humanitarian standpoint but also as a key agricultural policy that supports producers in Kansas and across the country.

“The State Department certainly has its hands full with what’s going on in the world, and I generally think that USDA is the place the program should be,” Moran continued. “Certainly, if the State Department is not interested or unable to continue to pursue this program, we’ve worked with the Trump administration to make certain that we find a home for it, and USDA has been very welcoming and very interested in leading the effort to feed the world.”

Moran said programs like Food for Peace not only support humanitarian efforts but also help create market opportunities for U.S. agriculture.

“This is useful. There’s a significant reason — moral reasons,” he said. “I remember driving through St. Francis, the hometown of the farmer who helped start this program, a couple of years ago, and in a small town in Kansas, I drove by the elevator and saw grain sorghum piled higher than the elevator — yet recognized that people around the world go to bed hungry. Why can’t we take — there’s no surplus in grains, it’s just that we haven’t utilized them yet — and feed people? That certainly helps them and creates a relationship that the United States needs with developing countries.”

Moran spoke about the economic challenges currently facing agriculture, citing high production costs, low commodity prices, drought conditions, and wildfire damage affecting producers across Kansas.

“It is also an economic opportunity to put grain into the market at a time when fertilizer prices, as you just highlighted, and the cost of production are so high, and commodity prices are so low,” he continued. “It’s a real challenge in agriculture today. I’ve said this ,and I believe it — it’s the most difficult time during my time as an elected official for farmers and ranchers.”

Finally, Moran touched on the bipartisan efforts on the Farm Bill as it awaits action in the Senate and emphasized the importance of providing farmers and ranchers with certainty as they navigate difficult economic conditions.

“Well, we are very grateful to the House. The House of Representatives Farm Bill transfers the program to USDA,” Moran said. “As I say, we have an amendment to the Farm Bill. We expect it to be included in the Senate version of the Farm Bill. I would tell you that Republican and Democratic members — bipartisan members of the Ag Committee — met last week to hash out our differences and see what the path forward is in getting a Farm Bill done in the Senate and sending it back to the House to make modifications or accept our modifications and get it signed by the President.”

According to Sen. Moran, the House version of the Farm Bill already includes that provision and expressed confidence that the Senate version will as well. He said Lindberg will have a significant opportunity to further administer a very important program for the United States, agriculture, and the world.

Related Stories
The behind-the-scenes role helps guide jump crews as they protect rural communities.
HTS Commodities broker Lewis Williamson joins us to break down the latest USDA Crop Progress Report and how weather and global supply chain issues could influence planting conditions moving forward.
Each spring, students from across Crawford County visit Arnold Family Farm for an annual u-pick strawberry festival that connects kids with agriculture.
Purdue University’s Dr. Michael Langemeier joins us to break down the latest read on farmer sentiment in the April Ag Economy Barometer, and growing concerns about the impact of global conflict on farm inputs and income.
Federal officials are signaling a more aggressive push on beef packer concentration, but any direct market impact will depend on what the investigation actually finds.
The court’s decision to deny the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert’s testimony serves as a sharp reminder of the high burden required to exclude expert testimony, particularly in the agricultural context, where “experience” is often the currency of reliability.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Rep. Adrian Smith joins us to discuss the push for nationwide year-round E15 sales and legislative hurdles for getting it into the farm bill.
The Supreme Court’s ruling could affect pesticide warning claims well beyond Roundup. Richard Gupton with the Ag Retailers Association joins us to explain the importance of federal pesticide labeling standards and discuss the potential impact on the ag industry and supply chain.
Farm Credit’s Christy Seyfert joined us to discuss the ag industry’s push for swift Farm Bill action as it heads toward a House vote.
Bridge payments are helping, but many producers still face losses and tight margins. AEM’s Curt Blades joins us to discuss how the current farm economy is pressuring equipment demand.
Feed demand and premiums drive growth for the crop
Purdue economist Dr. Joana Colussi discussed the U.S. and Brazil’s reliance on imported fertilizers and their impact on global food security amid rising input costs.