Meat Demand Trends Favor Retail Protein Purchases Growth

Domestic beef demand remains solid, with the strongest growth occurring through retail channels, according to consumers surveyed in the latest K-State Meat Demand Monitor.

MANHATTAN, Kan. (RFD NEWS) — U.S. consumers are buying and valuing meat differently than they did just a few years ago, with stronger retail demand and fewer people avoiding meat altogether, according to the Meat Demand Monitor led by Dr. Glynn Tonsor at Kansas State University.

Survey data covering 2020 through 2025 show the share of Americans identifying as meat consumers rose from just over 83 percent to more than 85 percent, while vegan and vegetarian claims declined, and many self-identified non-meat eaters still reported eating meat the previous day. Beef and pork consumption frequency remained relatively steady nationwide, though the Northeast consistently trailed other regions.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Domestic beef demand remains solid, with the strongest growth occurring through retail channels.
Tony St. James

Retail purchasing strengthened the most. Consumers’ willingness to pay for ground beef increased from about $7.26 per pound in 2020 to $9.18 in 2025, rising faster than general inflation. Grocery stores remained the dominant source for at-home meals, while quick-service and casual restaurants led away-from-home dining, but restaurant demand lagged retail growth.

Taste and freshness remained the top buying factors, with nutrition and health gaining importance, while environmental impact and animal-welfare claims declined in influence.

Related Stories
Mixed product pricing and rising milk supplies suggest margin management will remain critical as 2026 unfolds.
Corn and soybean exports continue to anchor weekly inspection totals, with China maintaining a visible role, while wheat and sorghum remain more dependent on regional and seasonal demand shifts.
Marilyn Schlake with the UNL Department of Agricultural Economics joined us for a closer look at the evolving role of livestock sale barns.
Rail continues to carry a larger share of the grain load, increasing sensitivity to rail capacity, labor, and pricing conditions.
Texas Farm Bureau President Russell Boening joined us with the latest update on storm conditions and impacts across the state.
Meat stocks rose seasonally but remain below last year overall, while tighter butter inventories could support dairy prices, and belly stocks warrant close watch for pork markets.
A mid-January winter storm delivered snow, ice, and extreme cold to a broad swath of the U.S., disrupting transportation, stressing livestock systems, and adding cost and complexity to winter farm operations as producers look toward spring.
Heavier weights and strong late-year slaughter supported December production, but lower annual totals highlight ongoing supply tightness heading into 2026.
Strong production and rising stocks may pressure ethanol margins unless demand or exports continue to improve.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Early indications suggest the U.S. cattle industry may be nearing the end of its liquidation phase. Oklahoma State University livestock economist Dr. Derrell Peel says the industry could be at or near the cyclical low.
Beef x Dairy cattle with strong genetics and documentation are earning prices comparable to native feeders.
Reliable waterways lower costs, protect export demand, and support long-term farm profitability.
Strong White House backing supports ethanol demand, but timing now hinges on Congress resolving procedural — at the same time as they push toward a spending bill to avert another federal government shutdown.
Greater transparency into USDA-backed lending can help rural lenders and producers better assess credit availability and investment trends.
Payment totals alone do not show financial stress — production costs and net losses complete the picture.