New Adverse Wage Rules Partially Fix Labor Issues

New wage rules improve accuracy but may still raise labor costs.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — New federal wage rules for H-2A visa farmworkers are addressing some long-standing problems but still leave key issues unresolved.

University of Georgia agricultural economists say the updated Adverse Effect Wage Rate (AEWR) system improves wage calculations but may still distort farm labor costs.

The U.S. Department of Labor shifted to a new system in 2025 that uses Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics data instead of the Farm Labor Survey. This change moves wage calculations to the state level and introduces two pay tiers based on skill level, replacing broader regional averages under the old system.

The new approach helps correct geographic aggregation issues. However, wage data still relies heavily on unemployment insurance records, which often exclude farms and instead reflect farm labor contractors and support businesses.

Job-level differences also remain a concern. Wages for crop workers, livestock labor, and equipment operators are averaged together, even though they typically earn different pay rates. That can push wages above typical crop worker levels, which make up most H-2A jobs.

Farm-Level Takeaway: New wage rules improve accuracy but may still raise labor costs.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist

(Tags: Labor, H-2A, AEWR, Wages, University of Georgia, Farm Policy)

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

China’s changing pork demand may limit export growth opportunities.
Spring Fieldwork Progress Mixed As Moisture Slows Activity
Margin pressure and competitiveness concerns are shaping cautious outlooks.
Leadership closer to western forests may speed decisions impacting timber, land use, and wildfire management.
Fewer DEF-related shutdowns could mean more uptime during planting and harvest seasons.
Consumer spending continues, but value-focused buying is on the rise.