Proposed Norfolk Southern-Union Pacific Merger Goes Off the Rails

The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — New details on the proposed rail merger between Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific. The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has rejected the initial application, citing missing key information.

The STB says the decision does not mean the merger is impossible. Both companies now have the opportunity to revise and resubmit their application. The initial paperwork was more than 6500 pages long. The STB says details on market share were missing, along with other contractual information.

Groups like the Soy Transportation Coalition (STC) have been watching the process since the merger was proposed. In a recent interview with RFD NEWS, STC Executive Director Mike Steenhoek says there are concerns across the ag spectrum about consolidation if that merger goes through.

“People point to the fact that this is not our first rodeo — we’ve had mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations within the rail industry for a number of decades,” Steenhoek explains. “What that does is it often results in higher rates, a decline in service, and, for agriculture and other industries, what you want is as many transportation providers competing for your business. That’s good for us, and when, all of a sudden, you start eliminating or reducing those transportation providers, you start changing that competitive balance away from the customer, agricultural shippers, in our case, or the railroad. So rightfully, there are a number of shippers who are very concerned about this.”

Leaders at Union Pacific say they have received more than 2,000 letters of support for the merger. STB says that while the application can be resubmitted, it will require another comprehensive review.

Related Stories
A new maritime biofuels coalition aims to position ocean shipping as a significant growth market for U.S. crops and waste-derived fuels.
Larger operations maintain cost advantages, while softer equipment sales suggest producers are pacing machinery upgrades amid tighter margins.
Transportation access, legal disputes, and fertilizer freight costs will directly influence input pricing and grain movement in 2026.
Mexico plans to release 202,000 acre-feet of water into the Rio Grande, offering temporary relief to South Texas farmers as Congress advances the PERMIT Act.
Despite China’s sharp drop in grain purchases this year, new USDA export data this week shows that even some buying activity from the trade giant still moves the markets.
Corn and wheat exports remain supportive, but weaker soybean demand — especially from China — continues to pressure oilseed markets.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Mike Steenhoek of the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses industry reactions to the proposed Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger, the Surface Transportation Board’s review process, and current conditions on the Mississippi River.
Richard Gupton of the Agricultural Retailers Association explains a new resource designed to help farmers comply with ESA-related pesticide label requirements.
Sen. Roger Marshall discusses the Senate’s unanimous passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and what expanded milk options could mean for students and dairy farmers. Industry groups say it is a win for student nutrition and dairy producers.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.