Rural Money: New Payment Rules Leave Farmers Facing Confusion at Local FSA Offices

New farm payment rules allow LLC members to have separate limits, but some local FSA offices are still applying outdated policies, creating confusion for producers.

Shelly_Muzzall_01_21_19_USA_WA_Three_Sisters_Farm_018.jpg

3 Sisters Family Farm (FarmHER S4, Ep. 9)

FarmHer, Inc.

TOPEKA, Kan. (RFD NEWS) — A major policy change affecting farm program payments is causing confusion at the local level, as some producers report being held to outdated rules despite new federal guidance.

Under the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA), Congress revised how payment limits apply to pass-through entities, such as LLCs and S corporations. The update allows individual members of those entities to qualify for separate payment limits, rather than being capped at a single limit per entity.

The change was intended to eliminate what industry experts have long called the “person trap,” which previously pushed some operations into more complex business structures to maximize eligibility.

However, implementation has been uneven.

According to agricultural tax and law specialist Roger McEowen and his colleague Paul Neiffer, many local Farm Service Agency offices are still applying the previous “one-entity, one-limit” standard.

That disconnect appears to stem from a lag in training and guidance at the county level. Local offices are now required to verify that each individual within an LLC or S corporation meets the “Actively Engaged in Farming” standard — meaning they must provide proportional labor, management, or capital.

That added verification has created administrative challenges, with some offices defaulting to older interpretations until further direction is provided by state or national leadership.

Producers who are told the rule has not changed may need to take additional steps. Experts recommend consulting the updated FSA Handbook and requesting that local determinations be reviewed or escalated to the state office.

Clear documentation is also critical. Farmers seeking separate payment limits should be prepared to show detailed records of each member’s contributions to the operation.

While the policy shift is widely viewed as a positive for many farm businesses, the rollout highlights a familiar challenge in agriculture policy — changes in Washington do not always translate immediately on the ground.

READ MORE: FSA Entity Confusion — Firm to Farm

Related Stories
National Corn Growers Association Chief Economist Krista Swanson discusses corn supply pressures, market fundamentals, policy considerations, and producer outlook for the year ahead.
The proposal signals a renewed push to offset tariff-driven losses, stabilize nutrition programs, and broaden eligibility for farm aid, though its path forward will depend on congressional negotiations.
Soft equipment sales signal cautious farm spending as producers prioritize cash flow over expansion.
Wind repowering offers a rare opportunity to renegotiate outdated leases and improve long-term land income for landowners who act early.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Meet Annaliese Wegner, a Wisconsin dairy FarmHER, mom to twins, and a passionate agriculture advocate.
What is “gross income from farming” for purposes of Chapter 12 (farm) bankruptcy – that is the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by Roger McEowen.
In today’s Firm to Farm blog post, Roger McOwen breaks down the Court’s regulations on unconstitutional federal power and the ruling’s impact on BOI reporting.
Watch Megan Shanley Warren, of Shanley Farms in Morro Bay, California, carry on her late father’s legacy, cultivating avocados and the tastiest fruit you haven’t yet discovered: finger limes.
The topic of this Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV agri-legal expert Roger McEowen is a potpourri of legal issues facing farmers and ranchers—farm bankruptcy, sovereign immunity, farm leases, and pipeline damages.