Study: Crop Insurance Greatly Reduces Revenue Risk

Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk.

agricultural land affected by flooding crop insurance_Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock.jpg

Photo By Andrii Yalanskyi via Adobe Stock

LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV)New research from North Dakota State University highlights the role of crop insurance in shielding farmers from revenue losses between 2015 and 2023.

Led by Senior Research Economist Francis Tsiboe, the study found that combining basic insurance products, such as Revenue Protection (RP) and Yield Protection (YP), with supplemental policies, including the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) and Enhanced Coverage Option (ECO), significantly boosted revenue stability.

Farmers using these combined programs had a 27.9 percent higher chance of recovering losses compared to those farming without insurance. Revenue variability dropped by nearly half, while downside risk fell by more than 80 percent.

Cotton saw the highest reduction in downside revenue risk at 88 percent, followed by corn, canola, and wheat. Geographically, states like Arizona, Iowa, and Illinois reported the strongest protections, while regions such as Arkansas and California saw more modest benefits.

The study also noted that the strongest protections often came with higher producer costs, though recent legislation in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) increased premium subsidies for SCO and ECO to 80 percent, easing the out-of-pocket burden for farmers.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Crop insurance remains a vital tool for managing climate-driven risk. Supplemental policies can significantly reduce revenue volatility, with expanded subsidies making them more accessible and affordable for producers nationwide.

Related Stories
Rural businesses report softer sales, tougher hiring, and restrained investment — a backdrop that can pinch farm support capacity even if posted prices cool.
High milk production and soft retail demand are squeezing prices and margins — making careful feed and risk management essential through year-end.
Brooks York with Agri-Sompo discusses how this year’s pricing period played out and what it could mean for farmers heading into the end of the season.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Stable U.S. fundamentals continue for major crops, but global adjustments in corn, soybeans, wheat, and cotton may influence early-2026 pricing.
Corn and wheat exports continue to outperform last year, while soybeans show steady but subdued movement compared to 2024.
Tariff relief and new trade agreements may temper food costs by reducing import costs.
Grain farms still have strong balance sheets, but another stretch of low profits will force hard cost cuts, especially on high-rent, highly leveraged operations.
Mold damage is tightening China’s corn supplies, supporting higher prices and creating potential demand for alternative feed grains in early 2026.
The new rule removes prevented-plant buy-up coverage, prompting strong objections from farm groups concerned about added risk exposure.