“Surprised they aren’t higher": Economists are caught off guard by the lack of fertilizer price action

Fertilizer costs are also top of mind during geopolitical turmoil.

Josh Linville with StoneX says the numbers are telling an interesting story right now.

“Truthfully, I have been surprised prices haven’t been higher. What other things have been keeping a lid on these fertilizer prices from going higher than where they are today is lower grain prices. Obviously, farmers everywhere are talking about the fact that grain prices are not great, they’re not attractive, and so that is keeping the lid because I think the fertilizer industry knows the farmers just can’t buy these values, certainly not ahead of next spring.”

Fertilizer prices have been relatively steady over the last few days. Analysts with DTN found no significant moves last week, with anhydrous falling in price over the last month. Seven of the eight major types are more expensive than a year ago, with urea holding 25 percent above 2024. Potash, on the other hand, is lower in price, falling around seven percent on the year.

Related Stories
Anhydrous prices are still 27 percent higher than a year ago.
The 90-day extension gives fertilizer suppliers additional transportation flexibility through the fall application season.
The return of Moroccan phosphate adds another fertilizer supply source ahead of fall application.
Lower prices could create opportunities for growers, while global supply concerns continue for phosphate.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Agricultural export prices rose in July even as broader U.S. export prices declined.
Weak grain prices could limit China’s demand for U.S. corn despite potential trade opportunities.
Smaller and regional beef processors could gain new opportunities as larger packing capacity declines.
President Donald Trump announced late Tuesday that new U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods are on hold for three days, saying the two countries are close to finalizing a deal.
Lower vessel draft limits could raise shipping costs for agricultural exports moving through the canal.
Fewer packing options could mean higher freight costs for Midwest cattle feeders.