Updated 45Z Rules Shift Biofuel Incentives Toward Feedstocks

Clearer 45Z rules favor U.S. oilseeds, but final RFS volumes remain critical to locking in demand.

20160602_072042.jpg

These photos are from an ARPA-E event hosted by Danforth, the Department of Energy, and the University of Arizona. At the time, this was the world’s largest robot conducting research on sorghum as an enhanced biofuel crop. (2025)

Tony St. James

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD NEWS) — Federal guidance on the 45Z Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit now more clearly steers biofuel incentives toward U.S.-grown crops, strengthening demand signals for domestic agriculture while narrowing eligibility for imported alternatives. Updated Treasury proposals implement changes enacted in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and clarify how the credit will function through 2029.

The revised guidance, to be published Wednesday in the Federal Register, prioritizes North American feedstocks, including U.S. soybeans and canola, while limiting eligibility for fuels made from imported waste oils such as used cooking oil and tallow. Industry groups say that change realigns biofuel policy with farm production rather than overseas sourcing.

A key shift is the removal of indirect land use change penalties from carbon scoring. That adjustment materially improves the economics for soy-based biofuels, effectively increasing the value of the credit and expanding eligibility across more oilseed pathways.

The update also underscores that 45Z works best alongside a strong Renewable Fuel Standard. Without complementary blending targets, the tax credit alone may not fully translate into sustained demand growth.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Clearer 45Z rules favor U.S. oilseeds, but final RFS volumes remain critical to locking in demand.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
In today’s Firm to Farm blog post, Roger McOwen breaks down the Court’s regulations on unconstitutional federal power and the ruling’s impact on BOI reporting.
The topic of this Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV agri-legal expert Roger McEowen is a potpourri of legal issues facing farmers and ranchers—farm bankruptcy, sovereign immunity, farm leases, and pipeline damages.
What can these facilities do to protect themselves? I wrote about this issue last spring, and since that time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued a significant opinion. That makes an update in order.
Updated Dicamba information is the topic of today’s Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV’s agri-legal expert Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law.
On January 31, the U.S. House overwhelmingly passed tax legislation containing provisions of importance to farmers and ranchers in particular and many taxpayers in general.
In this Firm to Farm blog post by RFD-TV legal expert Roger McEowen, he looks ahead at what might be the biggest issues in ag law and tax in 2024.
In part seven of his blog series,"Top 10 Developments in Ag Law and Tax in 2023,” agri-legal expert Roger McEowen covers the #1 issues, SCOTUS and defining a “Water of the United States.”
In part six of his blog series,"Top 10 Developments in Ag Law and Tax in 2023,” farm legal expert Roger McEowen tackles issue #2, foreign ownership of ag land.
In part five of his blog series, “Top 10 Developments in Ag Law and Tax in 2023,” Roger McEowen tackles issue number three, California’s Prop 12 pork regulations.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The U.S. trade deal with Argentina creates new export opportunities for U.S. livestock and crop producers but also raises competitive concerns.
Policies aimed at ground beef prices may primarily reshape dairy incentives rather than deliver lasting consumer savings.
More flexible export financing could strengthen demand in emerging markets and support higher U.S. agricultural exports.
Incremental trade clarity with India could support select U.S. ag exports, but major gains hinge on future market-access talks.
The phone call injected optimism into the soybean market, but actual Chinese buying and its timing will ultimately determine the extent of U.S. agricultural export benefits.
Regulatory uncertainty could slow the growth of fiber and grain hemp unless implementation is delayed.