USDA Announces Payments Under the 2026 Pima Cotton and Wool Trust Funds

March 15 of each year is the application deadline for the Pima Cotton Trust, and March 1 of each year is the application deadline for the Wool Trust. The law mandates trust payments by April 15. More information about these programs is available at www.fas.usda.gov/programs.

usda logo.png

United States Department of Agriculture

(Washington, D.C., April 14, 2026, USDA) – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announces payments under the 2026 Pima Agriculture Cotton Trust Fund and the 2026 Agriculture Wool Apparel Manufacturers Trust Fund. The U.S. textile industry has historically enjoyed strong support and assistance from the U.S. Government; however, various trade agreements and other unfair practices during the last 20 years have resulted in a decline not just in textiles, but across domestic manufacturing in general.

Currently, U.S. fabric and clothing manufacturers must comply with a tariff inversion — a tariff policy that reduces the cost of moving production overseas and exporting finished goods back into the United States compared with importing fabric and manufacturing domestically. The annual Pima Cotton and Wool trust payments provide financial support to U.S. companies equal to the benefits manufacturers would receive if duty reductions remained in effect, allowing them to grow payrolls, increase production, and regain market share.

“U.S. textile companies produce world-renowned quality products and employ a highly skilled workforce,” said Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Stephen A. Vaden. “These payments strengthen our domestic manufacturers and ensure a fair playing field for American textiles, helping rebuild this important industry. More American companies should take advantage of this program and manufacture more of the clothing we all wear here in the U.S.A.”

Section 12314 of the 2014 Farm Bill established the Pima Cotton Trust, which USDA administers. The Pima Cotton Trust is currently funded through 2031 with $16 million in Commodity Credit Corporation funds each year.

The purpose of the Pima Cotton Trust is to reduce the economic injury to domestic cotton manufacturers resulting from tariffs on cotton fabric that are higher than tariffs on certain apparel articles made of cotton fabric.

The law mandates payments under the Pima Cotton Trust as follows:

  • 25 percent to one or more nationally recognized associations established for the promotion of Pima cotton for use in textile and apparel goods.
  • 25 percent to yarn spinners of Pima cotton that produce ring-spun cotton yarns in the United States.
  • 50 percent to manufacturers that cut and sew cotton shirts in the United States and that certify that they used imported cotton fabric in the preceding year.

Section 12315 of the 2014 Farm Bill established the Wool Trust, which USDA also administers. The Wool Trust is currently funded through 2031 with up to $30 million in CCC funds per year.

The purpose of the Wool Trust is to reduce the injury to domestic manufacturers resulting from tariffs on certain wool fabric that are higher than tariffs on certain apparel articles made of wool fabric.

The Wool Trust provides four types of payments:

  1. Payments to manufacturers of certain worsted wool fabrics.
  2. Monetization of the wool tariff-rate quota.
  3. Duty compensation payments for wool yarn, wool fiber and wool top.
  4. Refunds of duties paid on imports of certain wool products.

March 15 of each year is the application deadline for the Pima Cotton Trust, and March 1 of each year is the application deadline for the Wool Trust. The law mandates trust payments by April 15. More information about these programs is available at www.fas.usda.gov/programs.

###

Press release provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture

Related Stories
Rural population growth and stabilizing economic indicators point to post-pandemic recovery, but uneven income, shifting industries, and regional divides remain key challenges for rural communities.
Brian Earnest, an animal protein economist with CoBank, shares insights into current demand trends and the challenges facing broiler production.
Decoupled base acres may amplify income inequality and distort planting decisions as farm program payments increase.
Large Brazilian crops heighten downside price risk if the weather allows production to reach projected levels.
University of Nebraska President Dr. Jeffrey Gold joined us to discuss seasonal affective disorder, winter mental health, and practical strategies for maintaining well-being in rural communities.
The Farm Bureau is making an urgent call to Congress for more farm support. Colton Lacina with Farmers National Company joined us to discuss farmland values and how market dynamics for the year ahead reflect stabilization rather than collapse.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

From meatpacking settlements to landmark NEPA rulings, Roger McEowen outlines the top legal developments in 2025 that will shape agriculture in the years ahead.
Alan Bjerga with the National Milk Producers Federation joined us to review new policies and regulations supporting the dairy industry and what they mean for the year ahead.
Despite rising costs and growing food insecurity, meat demand remained strong in 2025 as higher-income consumers offset cutbacks elsewhere. Economists break down the K-shaped economy, upcoming USDA cattle reports, livestock production outlooks, and renewed debate over beef imports and country-of-origin labeling heading into 2026.
Corn growers are turning to ethanol, E15 expansion, and export markets to help absorb record supplies and stabilize prices. Farm leaders discuss low-carbon ethanol demand, flex-fuel vehicle challenges, input costs, and the role of USMCA as producers look for market relief in the year ahead.
From rising trade tensions in Europe to a pending Supreme Court decision on tariffs and shifting demand from China, global trade policy spearheaded by President Donald Trump continues to shape the outlook for U.S. agriculture—adding uncertainty as farmers navigate another volatile year.
The Surface Transportation Board rejects the proposed Norfolk Southern–Union Pacific merger, prompting concerns from agricultural shippers about rail consolidation, service reliability, and higher transportation costs.