LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD NEWS) — Calls to dismantle the largest U.S. beef packers could backfire on cattle producers and consumers by raising costs, increasing volatility, and weakening the industry’s ability to withstand shocks. That warning comes from Hyrum Egbert, a food and protein industry executive, who argues that scale — not consolidation for its own sake — underpins today’s beef system.
Egbert points to decades of USDA Economic Research Service findings showing that large, high-volume packing plants operate at materially lower per-head costs than smaller facilities. Those efficiencies help sustain cattle bids, support food safety investment, and keep beef competitive in export markets that now account for roughly 14 percent of U.S. production.
Forcing plants to split or downsize would raise fixed costs per animal, increase vulnerability during droughts or market downturns, and reduce investment in grading, traceability, and food safety systems. While more packers might briefly boost competition, Egbert notes the long-term result would likely be plant failures, wider basis swings, and higher retail prices.
He also warns that fragmentation could accelerate retailer vertical integration, shifting power away from producers rather than restoring it.
Shaun Haney joined RFD News to discuss the potential impact of the Trump-Xi summit uncertainty, ongoing agricultural trade talks, and why geopolitical developments could carry important implications for farmers and global commodity markets.
