Financial Pressure Shifts Consumer Meat Choices in May Without Erasing Demand

Consumers are watching affordability, but projected beef demand remains strong enough to sustain market attention.

MANHATTAN, KAN. (RFD NEWS) — Consumer financial pressure is changing meat preferences, but it has not removed demand. Kansas State University agricultural economist Glynn Tonsor reports the May Meat Demand Monitor (PDF Version) found willingness to pay declined for most retail products and foodservice meals.

At the grocery store, the projected market share for ground beef increased to 26 percent, while chicken breast held the largest share at 28 percent. Combined projected beef and pork shares reached 34 percent and 19 percent, respectively.

In foodservice, projected beef market share climbed to 44 percent, led by hamburgers at 28 percent and ribeye steak at 16 percent. Willingness to pay increased for both beef meals, even as it declined for most alternatives.

Household finances help explain the mixed signal. Only 15 percent of respondents reported finances better than a year earlier, while 39 percent reported worse conditions. Taste, freshness, price, and safety remained the leading factors in protein purchase decisions.

The monthly survey tracks consumer preferences rather than completed sales. Still, the results suggest value matters more, while beef demand remains resilient in retail and restaurant channels.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Consumers are watching affordability, but projected beef demand remains strong enough to sustain attention in the livestock market.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Higher output keeps milk supplies ample, reinforcing expectations for softer dairy prices even as feed costs remain favorable.
RFD Farm Legal & Tax expert Roger McEowen shares guidance on the 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit, its impact on renewable energy and agriculture, and what producers should know moving forward.
Border closures tied to the threat of New World Screwworm continue to stall Mexican fed cattle imports, tightening U.S. feeder cattle supplies over time — triggering feedlot closures that hinder herd rebuilding efforts, threaten the beef supply chain, and shrink production while consumer prices stay elevated.
The debate now matters as much as the policy — market rules and regulatory clarity depend on whether Congress can finish the bill this year.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Tyson’s closure reflects deep supply shortages in the U.S. cattle industry, tightening packing capacity, weakening competition, and signaling more volatility ahead for cow-calf producers and feedyards.
Lower tariff rates and new rail-service proposals may improve corn movement efficiency during early-season marketing.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Early Cattle-on-Feed estimates point to slightly tighter cattle supplies, reinforcing the need to monitor prices and timing for winter marketing.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.
Row crop losses in 2025 are outpacing last year. With no disaster aid yet approved, many operations face a tough financial bridge to 2026 even as Farm Bill improvements remain a year away.