High Diesel Costs Could Change Where Farmers Deliver Grain

Soy Transportation Coalition’s Mike Steenhoek discusses how rising diesel costs affect grain delivery decisions and how farmers can use their free calculator to compare transportation costs and protect profitability.

ANKENY, IOWA (RFD-TV) — Rising diesel prices are changing the cost of moving grain to market, prompting farmers to reconsider whether hauling crops to a distant buyer for a higher price still makes financial sense.

Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Soy Transportation Coalition, said farmers typically weigh local grain prices against offers from more distant buyers. Higher fuel costs can change which option delivers the best return.

“When all of a sudden diesel fuel goes from roughly $3.50 a gallon, which it was last year, to $6.30 a gallon, which it is this year, all of a sudden that change has an impact on the calculations,” Steenhoek said.

Higher Hauling Costs Affect Profitability

Steenhoek said farmers may have several options for selling their grain, including a local elevator about 10 miles away or a processor 50 miles away.

A more distant buyer may offer a higher price, but the additional revenue must cover the cost of hauling the grain.

He said a producer might receive $12.15 per bushel from a distant buyer compared with $12 per bushel locally. When fuel and other transportation expenses increase, the local option may become more profitable.

“The goal is not to maximize revenue. The goal is to maximize profit,” Steenhoek said.

He encouraged producers to calculate their transportation expenses before deciding where to deliver grain.

Online Calculator Helps Compare Delivery Options

The Soy Transportation Coalition offers an online calculator designed to help farmers determine the most profitable delivery location.

Available at SoyTransportation.org/calculator, the tool allows producers to compare local and distant markets using factors such as fuel costs, delivery distance, labor, vehicle maintenance, and the price offered at each location.

Steenhoek said farmers can enter information for both delivery options and compare the resulting profit per load.

The calculator also accounts for the return trip, helping producers evaluate full transportation costs rather than only the price offered by a buyer.

He said the tool can help farmers determine whether a higher price at a distant location justifies the additional expense.

USDA Fuel Relief Offers Some Assistance

Steenhoek said USDA’s $8 billion Harvest Fuel Relief program should provide some needed assistance as farmers face higher fuel costs.

“A billion dollars is not an insignificant amount of money,” Steenhoek said. “It’s going to be providing some needed relief to farmers.”

However, he said direct payments do not replace the need for strong markets and reliable demand for agricultural products.

“I don’t know of a single farmer that got into the business and remains in this business in order to receive revenue from the federal government,” he said.

Steenhoek said farmers ultimately want to produce food for domestic and international markets and meet demand for nutrition and protein.

LEARN MORE: www.soytransportation.org/calculator

Related Stories
USDA Selects Eight Projects Representing More Than $1.3 Billion in American Fertilizer Manufacturing Investment to Strengthen National Security and Support Farmers
Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas discusses the Harvest Fuel Relief program, producers’ financial pressures, and next steps for farm legislation.
GasBuddy says Chinese production and Russian oil remain key factors for diesel supplies.
Higher shipping costs could make U.S. grain less competitive overseas.

Marion is a digital content manager for RFD News and FarmHER + RanchHER. She started working for Rural Media Group in May 2022, bringing a decade of digital experience in broadcast media and some cooking experience to the team.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

AFBF Deputy Chief Economist Dr. Faith Parum says Title I commodity payment rates are expected in November. Producers should watch for USDA application details and contact local FSA offices.
ASFMRA’s Spencer Smith discusses farmland lease negotiations and the financial considerations facing landowners and farm operators as they head into the 2027 crop year.
Federal relief for highway use of red-dyed diesel does not automatically eliminate federal fuel taxes or override state laws, Washburn School of Law’s Roger McEowen warns.
Created with the National FFA Organization, AgCareers.com’s Classroom Implementation Kit offers educators free resources to explore agricultural careers.
Army Majors Eric and Angela Czaja use regenerative grazing to improve military training lands and help veterans build agricultural careers through Boots to Roots.
Shaun Haney examines Alberta’s vote to remain in Canada and the unresolved tensions over energy policy, agricultural trade and federal-provincial relations.
Venessa Wood, founder of Ag Women Connect, discussed the organization’s growth, agricultural advocacy, mentorship and efforts to recognize women while supporting the next generation.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities discusses harvest progress and conditions, grain market trends, export demand, and input costs weighing on farmers.
Jordan Wicks, meat science professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, discussed the research behind the flat iron steak and its impact on consumers and the beef industry.
NCBA and PLC Policy Director Garrett Edmonds discusses federal wolf-management efforts, echoing USDA’s call for states to review policies and engage livestock producers.
Michael and Fredrick Hawkins of Hawkins Cattle Company share about their upcoming Cattle 101 event in Texas, designed to introduce young people and families to beef production and agricultural careers.
StoneX Director of Fertilizer Josh Linville discusses global supply pressures, fertilizer price volatility, and purchasing strategies for farmers preparing for fall applications and the 2027 growing season.