House Ag Committee approves $300 billion in cuts to nutrition spending

House Ag.jpg

Photo via Official Twitter

The House Ag Committee spent all day and night voting on President Trump’s tax cut bill, also known as the “One Big, Beautiful Bill,” specifically marking up language tied to SNAP and farm security.

Tonight, they voted 29-25 to advance legislation that cuts $300 billion in food aid spending, according to Politico.

The vote now goes to the House Budget Committee before a full floor vote.

Chair GT Thompson explained the GOP strategy.
“More specifically, our reconciliation instructions provide the opportunity to restore integrity to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, to make sure that this essential program works for the most vulnerable and functions as Congress as it is intended. Additionally, it allows for vital investment with our Farm Bill programs addressing immediate needs for farmers, ranchers, and rural communities. By putting the farm back in the Farm Bill, Congress will be better able to deliver a full, long-term reauthorization of a highly effective Farm Bill.

Story via Grace Yarrow with Politico

Related Stories
Nutrition policy shifts may influence retail demand across agriculture.
The debate now matters as much as the policy — market rules and regulatory clarity depend on whether Congress can finish the bill this year.
Roger McEowen with the Washburn School of Law reviews key highlights from the House Agriculture Committee’s latest farm bill proposal.
President Donald Trump speaks at the World Economic Forum in Davos, addressing SNAP spending, tariff threats against Europe, market reactions, and the upcoming USMCA review.
House Agriculture Committee Democrats are calling for action on the Farm and Family Relief Act, warning that proposed SNAP cost shifts to states could reduce food assistance for low-income families amid ongoing tariffs and trade disruptions that continue to strain U.S. farmers.
Federal nutrition policy is signaling a stronger demand for whole foods produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. Consumer-facing guidance favors animal protein, but institutional demand may change little under existing saturated fat limits.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Screwworm.gov has targeted resources for a wide range of stakeholders, including livestock producers, veterinarians, animal health officials, wildlife professionals, healthcare providers, pet owners, researchers, drug manufacturers, and the general public.
Mike Steenhoek of the Soy Transportation Coalition discusses industry reactions to the proposed Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern merger, the Surface Transportation Board’s review process, and current conditions on the Mississippi River.
Richard Gupton of the Agricultural Retailers Association explains a new resource designed to help farmers comply with ESA-related pesticide label requirements.
Sen. Roger Marshall discusses the Senate’s unanimous passage of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and what expanded milk options could mean for students and dairy farmers. Industry groups say it is a win for student nutrition and dairy producers.
Crop producers face tightening credit and lower incomes, while strong cattle markets continue to stabilize finances in livestock-heavy regions.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.