USDA Links Rural Investment With Stronger County Growth

The report highlighted the role rural development programs play in supporting housing, infrastructure and essential services.

clifton-tn-antique-district_By-Austin-via-Adobe-Stock.png

The antique district in Clifton, Tennessee, was accredited by the Tennessee Main Street program in 2021 after their participation in the project. (Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock)

Photo by Austin via Adobe Stock

WASHINGTON, DC (RFD NEWS) — USDA reported last week that rural development investment is used most heavily in farming-dependent counties, connecting farm communities with housing, utilities, business financing, and essential services. The Economic Research Service reviewed Rural Development program obligations from 2000 through 2024.

Farm-dependent nonmetropolitan counties recorded the highest participation, with per-person investment rising from $3,741 in 2000-2011 to $4,693 in 2012-2024. The Southeast received the largest overall share of obligations, while the Rocky Mountain region led on a rural per-person basis.

Counties receiving the highest per-person investment averaged 39.9 percent real income growth over the study period, compared with 31.8 percent in the lowest-investment group. USDA cautions that the comparison shows an association, not proof that the funding alone caused higher growth.

Single-family housing accounted for 55 percent of obligations, and higher participation was associated with higher homeownership. Most support came through loans: 57 percent through guarantees and 33 percent through direct loans, while grants accounted for 10 percent.

For producers, rural housing, water, power, broadband, health care, and business capacity influence whether workers and families can remain in agricultural communities.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Rural development investment supports the housing, services, and infrastructure farm communities need to retain workers and remain viable.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
These “USDA Foods” are provided to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) nutrition assistance programs, including food banks that operate The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), and are a vital component of the nation’s food safety net.
Lower U.S. and Mexican production means tighter sugar supplies and greater reliance on imports headed into 2026.
Screwworm.gov has targeted resources for a wide range of stakeholders, including livestock producers, veterinarians, animal health officials, wildlife professionals, healthcare providers, pet owners, researchers, drug manufacturers, and the general public.
Supplemental Disaster Relief Program Stage Two will disburse around $16 billion, approved by Congress last year. Sign-ups begin Monday, and producers have until April to return applications.
Early Cattle-on-Feed estimates point to slightly tighter cattle supplies, reinforcing the need to monitor prices and timing for winter marketing.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer explains the USDA’s Stage Two Supplemental Disaster Relief Program, including application details, deadlines, and guidance for rural producers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Nitrogen and phosphate markets are tightening ahead of spring, keeping fertilizer costs elevated while crop prices lag.
In the U.S. and Canada, reduced planted acres—not yield losses—led to a decline in potato production, while Mexico saw modest gains due to increased yields and harvested areas.
AFBF Economist Samantha Ayoub discusses the latest data on Chapter 12 farm bankruptcy filings and what the troubling trend signals for the farm economy. At the same time, bigger loans and higher rates are squeezing working capital and increasing financial risk.
Corn demand remains supportive, but weaker soybean buying limits overall export momentum.
Farm numbers still favor small operations, but production, resilience, and risk management are increasingly concentrated among fewer, larger farms.
China’s reliance on imported soybeans remains entrenched, shaping global demand and trade leverage.