USDA Trims U.S. Ag Trade Deficit by $8 Billion in Latest Outlook

The ag trade deficit is narrowing, but export competition remains strong.

trade_adobe stock.png

Adobe Stock

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — The U.S. agricultural trade deficit is expected to shrink in fiscal year 2026, but the latest U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) outlook, released in late February, shows the sector remains far from returning to the decades-long export surplus that historically supported farm profitability. While export demand is stabilizing in some sectors, strong import growth and global competition continue to weigh on the trade balance.

Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Trade: February 2026 projects exports at $174 billion and imports at $203 billion, resulting in a $29 billion deficit. That marks an improvement from the $37 billion deficit forecast in December, but still reflects a structural shift from the nearly 60 years when U.S. agriculture consistently ran a trade surplus.

Operationally, soybean and oilseed exports remain under pressure as Brazil and Argentina continue to expand production and capture global market share. China’s demand for U.S. soybeans also remains below earlier peak levels, contributing to softer export prospects for oilseeds.

Regionally, grain exports are showing relative strength. USDA forecasts $42.4 billion in grain and feed exports for 2026, including a stronger corn demand of $18.5 billion. Livestock, poultry, and dairy exports are forecast near $39.1 billion, with dairy exports increasing while beef export values were revised slightly lower.

Looking ahead, producers and markets will closely watch the scheduled 2026 review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Canada and Mexico together purchase more than $58 billion in U.S. agricultural goods annually, making the outcome of the agreement’s six-year review a key factor shaping export access and price stability.

Related Stories
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer joined us on Thursday’s Market Day Report to discuss the implications for farmers.
Chris Bliley with Growth Energy discusses ongoing concerns about U.S. ethanol exports and the expansion of market access promised under the Phase One deal between the U.S. and China.
“It does not extinguish right away here — in any sort of sense — the real profitability concerns and people’s ability to pay bills and get to the other side of this in the very short term. This is where the skepticism builds.”
U.S. Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) shares his perspective on the U.S.-China trade developments and their potential impact on American producers, farmers, and ranchers.
Rich Nelson, a commodity broker for Allendale Inc., joins us to break down what the U.S.-China trade agreement means for the ag economy.
The U.S.-China summit raises hopes for stronger exports and reduced barriers, but U.S. ag players should remain strategically cautious until concrete volumes and certifications materialize.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Expect modest relief on several produce lines, mixed protein trends into holiday buying, and softer veg-oil costs — a good week to sharpen forward buys selectively.
A strong corn export pull is supportive of bids; soybeans need steady vessel programs or fresh sales to firm cash.
USDA will meet part of November SNAP benefits under court direction, citing insufficient funds for full payments.
An import lag for ground beef will likely look different than last year’s egg shortage. The difference comes down to biosecurity and market flexibility.
China’s crusher losses and Brazil tensions, Gale warns, could reopen critical soybean trade channels for U.S. producers.
Persistently low Mississippi River levels are turning logistics challenges into pricing risks — tightening margins for grain producers and exporters across the heartland.