USTR Holds Line With Managed Trade Against China

Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.

WASHINTON, DC (RFD-TV) — As the U.S. maintains steep tariffs on Chinese goods, Trade Representative Jamieson Greer faces scrutiny on Capitol Hill today. Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.

Tuesday morning, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will be in the hot seat. He is facing a Senate subcommittee regarding spending for next year. Greer’s question will likely focus on budget needs, but he is also likely to be questioned about trade and how recent policy shifts have impacted his office.

Greer recently returned from high-profile talks overseas as U.S. officials look to open more markets to replace China. Greer will take his seat before the committee this morning at 10:00 am ET.

Producers face a policy built for leverage, not quick detente. The U.S. Trade Representative is maintaining roughly 55% tariffs on Chinese goods as a “good status quo,” signaling no immediate cuts while trade talks continue. The strategy keeps pressure on Beijing while allowing targeted deals that favor U.S. producers, reflecting a shift toward managed trade rather than across-the-board liberalization.

At the Economic Club of New York, Ambassador Jamieson Greer said the administration intends to keep tariffs as a long-term tool until China addresses broader concerns like rare earths, intellectual property, and export restrictions. The message: Washington sees tariff leverage as essential to defending key supply chains and enforcing fair competition.

For agriculture, the approach means continued uncertainty. China’s soybean purchases have become tactical rather than consistent, and USTR is pressing for enforceable commitments rather than promises. Greer also pointed to ongoing enforcement disputes under USMCA, especially with Mexico, where agricultural market access remains a flashpoint. Farmers should expect bursts of demand tied to negotiations rather than steady flows, and widening basis spreads as exporters react to shifting headlines.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Stay flexible on sales — watch Gulf versus interior spreads, and hedge around headline windows while USTR keeps tariffs as leverage.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Expert
Related Stories
Rail logistics remain supportive, with access to Mexico improving
The closure of Lubbock Feeders highlights mounting pressure on the U.S. cattle supply, according to the Texas Cattle Feeders Association, as border restrictions and costs strain feedyards.
U.S.-Mexico agricultural trade faces uncertainty in 2026 as tariffs and cartel violence threaten farmers and ranchers. Congressman Henry Cuellar and Texas leaders weigh in on impacts and risks.
At Commodity Classic in San Antonio, growers explore new herbicide options, John Deere’s latest 8 Series tractors, and cutting-edge ag technology shaping the 2026 planting season. Here are some of RFD NEWS’ highlights from the event so far.
Farm CPA Paul Neiffer provided insight on updated PLC rate estimates, the role of base acres, and the upcoming enrollment window for ARC and PLC programs.
USDA Farmer Bridge Assistance payments could begin this weekend as producers face tight margins, shifting acreage expectations, cattle herd contraction, and growing pressure for a stronger farm safety net.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Tariff refunds are underway, potentially returning billions to importers, as agriculture groups push for a larger role in trade policy and investigations.
Patrick De Haan with GasBuddy joined us to discuss diesel price volatility and what farmers can expect as geopolitical tensions continue to impact energy markets.
Spring Weather Shapes Planting Pace Across U.S. Regions
Hemp growth is driven by floral demand, with mixed returns elsewhere.
Tight supply and logistics issues may raise input costs.
Farm programs remain small but politically easier to expand.