ACRE Act Begins Lowering Borrowing Costs for Producers

The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.

Waco Bend Ranch 1280x720.jpg

Williams Trew Real Estate - Allen Crumley

Photo via Williams Trew Real Estate’s website

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (RFD-TV) — A new tax exemption for farmland real estate loans is beginning to reduce borrowing costs for farmers, even as lenders await formal guidance on how to apply the law. The Access to Credit for our Rural Economy Act (PDF Version) — also known as ACRE, which is included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) — took effect immediately on July 4 and gives banks a 25 percent tax exemption on interest earned from newly originated farmland loans.

While far smaller than the 100-percent exemption proposed initially, it still helps producers facing squeezed margins from high input costs and softer grain markets.

The law is expected to be especially helpful for farmers seeking to purchase land they currently rent or expand existing acreage. Bankers say even a quarter-point rate reduction can meaningfully improve cash flow for beginning farmers. But most institutions are moving cautiously while waiting for Treasury and IRS guidance clarifying technical gray areas, including how to handle the partial exemption, whether certain refinancings qualify, and how chattel or equipment loans might be treated when bundled into real estate deals.

Despite its limitations, the ACRE Act improves commercial banks’ competitiveness against the Farm Credit System, which receives a full interest-income exemption.

ABA estimates the law could save producers roughly $100 per acre annually over the next 30 years — far more than recent one-time emergency payments. Bankers also view the legislation as a significant policy foothold that builds momentum for future expansions, especially if Congress revisits broader tax legislation in the coming years.

Farm-Level Takeaway: The ACRE Act modestly reduces farmland borrowing costs now, with more savings possible once federal guidance clarifies which loans qualify.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Related Stories
How the Public Trust Doctrine Threatens Agricultural Property Rights
Reducing mental stress and focusing on controllable actions can improve decision-making in high-pressure environments, according to Hollywood actor and former Calif Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Prompt removal of Christmas trees and careful handling of decorations reduce winter fire risk during an already high-demand season for emergency services.
AFBF Economist Faith Parum provides analysis and perspective on the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program—what commodity growers should know and potential remedies for producers facing crop losses where that aid falls short.
In a post to social media, Trump said Venezuela will buy American agriculture products and will use the money from oil sales to make it happen.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Expanding bioethanol use strengthens rural economies, supports farm markets, and positions U.S. agriculture at the center of global low-carbon trade.
NCBA CEO Colin Woodall says more conversations need to occur with stakeholders present surrounding President Trump’s proposal to lower consumer beef prices with Argentinian imports.
Corn and wheat inspections outpaced last year, but soybean movement remains seasonally active yet behind, keeping basis and freight dynamics in focus by corridor.
Lawmakers are pressing for answers on how Washington’s “managed trade” approach — keeping leverage through long-term tariffs — will affect farmers, global markets, and future export opportunities.
Beef industry groups seem to agree — market-based pricing, not federal intervention, best supports rancher livelihoods and long-term beef supply stability.
Cattle groups say additional imports would offer little relief for consumers but could erode rancher confidence as the industry begins to rebuild herds.