Agri Stats Settlement Targets Sales Books And Rankings

Agri Stats would no longer be allowed to show participant lists, rankings, or “flags,” and it could only report individual company data in narrow situations.

LUBBOCK, TEXAS (RFD NEWS) — A proposed settlement in the Agri Stats antitrust case would force major changes in how the company collects, packages, and sells market information to the meat industry. The biggest step is that Agri Stats would have to stop offering its Sales Report Books, which were central to the case.

The settlement would also ban several reporting features critics said made the system too revealing. Agri Stats would no longer be allowed to show participant lists, rankings, or “flags,” and it could only report individual company data in narrow situations, such as returning a contributor’s own information back to that contributor.

The proposal also opens access more broadly. Agri Stats would have to make its reports and manuals available for purchase to anyone in the United States, not just meat processors, and it could not discourage outside buyers by offering worse terms or higher prices.

Other changes would slow and aggregate the data more heavily. Major reports would have to meet stricter confidentiality thresholds, and most reported data would need to be at least 45 days old on average, with some production-decision data delayed even longer.

The company would also be placed under outside oversight through a court-approved monitor and a formal antitrust compliance program. The monitor could remain in place for up to seven years, while the overall judgment would last ten years unless ended sooner.

Farm-Level Takeaway: The Agri Stats settlement would not shut the company down, but it would sharply limit how it reports meat industry data and how long it can operate without outside oversight.
Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Related Stories
Record corn and sorghum crops boost feed grain supplies, while reduced soybean and cotton production tighten outlooks for oilseeds and fiber markets.
Food prices increased in December, but not as much as expected, according to the latest Consumer Price Index from the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
Lewis Williamson with HTS Commodities joined us to provide analysis on the January WASDE report and expectations for grain markets going forward.
Structural efficiency supports cattle prices and resilience — breaking it risks higher costs and greater volatility.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Panama matters to agriculture as both a freight corridor and a potential future market for U.S. ethanol.
Producers using farm entities should review ownership, labor contributions, and FSA paperwork before September 15.
Ethanol and feed coproduct exports remain strong outlets for corn demand, even after April’s pullback.
Trade estimates point to only modest changes in U.S. grain ending stocks ahead of USDA’s June 11 WASDE report.
Farmers may need flexible marketing plans as tighter supplies and uncertain demand heighten price risks for corn and soybeans.
Global fiber demand is growing, but cotton producers benefit only when cotton gains value and competes for market share.