JBS Strike Enters Third Week in Ongoing Labor Dispute

Processing disruptions could impact cattle markets if the strike continues.

The raw meat packer and the slaughterer work in the slaughterhouse. By EmmaStock.png

The raw meat packer and the slaughterer work in the slaughterhouse.

By EmmaStock

Photo by EmmaStock via Adobe Stock

NASHVILLE, TENN. (RFD NEWS) — A labor dispute at one of the nation’s largest beef processing facilities is continuing into a third week, raising concerns about potential impacts on production and the broader cattle market.

Nearly 3,800 workers at JBS-owned Swift Beef Company in Greeley, Colorado, remain on strike as negotiations between the company and union representatives have stalled. The strike, which began on March 16, centers on allegations of unfair labor practices, wage concerns, and workplace conditions.

Union officials say the company has not returned to the bargaining table, while workers are seeking higher wages that better reflect inflation, along with improvements in health care costs and safety practices. The dispute follows months of negotiations and comes after workers voted to authorize a strike earlier this year.

Operational impacts are becoming more visible. Reports indicate the Greeley facility — one of the largest beef plants in the country — has been largely idle, with only limited production. Attempts to shift output to other plants have not fully offset the lost capacity, contributing to a reduction in market share.

The situation comes at a time when the beef sector is already navigating tight cattle supplies and strong demand, making any disruption to processing capacity more significant for the supply chain.

If the strike continues, it could tighten near-term beef supplies and add volatility to cattle markets, particularly in the Plains region.

Farm-Level Takeaway: Processing disruptions could impact cattle markets if the strike continues.
Tony St. James, RFD NEWS Markets Specialist
Related Stories
A high-stakes legal case in a South Dakota federal court concerning misleading country-of-origin labeling (MCOOL), such as “Product of the USA,” on food products, will significantly impact U.S. agricultural policy for years to come.
Freight volatility increasingly determines export margins, making logistics costs as important as price in marketing decisions.
Secretary Rollins also met with specialty crop producers at a local strawberry farm to discuss workforce needs and the Trump Administration’s recent wins related to significantly cutting the cost of H-2A labor for California farmers.
China’s beef policy risk stems from domestic volatility, making export demand inherently unstable. Jake Charleston with Specialty Risk Insurance offers his perspective on cattle markets, risk management, and producer sentiment.
Structural efficiency supports cattle prices and resilience — breaking it risks higher costs and greater volatility.
Strong pork demand and improving beef exports outside China support protein markets despite ongoing trade barriers.

Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

Strong balance sheets still matter, but liquidity, planning, and lender relationships are critical as ag credit tightens, according to analysis from AgAmerica Lending.
Protein-driven dairy growth is boosting beef supply potential, creating an opening to support rural jobs and ground beef availability.
U.S. agriculture entered the week with mixed signals as weather, logistics, and markets shaped early-year decisions. Here is a regional breakdown of domestic crop and livestock production for the week of Monday, Jan. 19, 2026.
While short-term volatility remains a risk, softer ocean freight rates in 2026 could improve export margins.
Trade volatility and shifting export destinations increase marketing risk for producers heading into 2026.
Rising rural business confidence supports local ag economies, but taxes and labor shortages remain key constraints.