Farmers for Free Trade Highlights Tariff Impact on Farm Input Costs

“Farmers for Free Trade” warns that disaster is brewing as President Trump’s trade policy is causing farm input costs to rise even more.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD-TV) — Expanding global market access remains a top priority for U.S. farmers as harvest rolls on — and one group, Farmers for Free Trade, is hitting the road to make sure those voices are heard. A “Motorcade for Trade” is traveling across America’s Heartland, gathering firsthand stories from producers to share with lawmakers in Washington.

The group plans to deliver those insights directly to policymakers, highlighting how consistent access to global markets supports prices and rural economies.

Brian Kuehl, Executive Director of Farmers for Free Trade, joined us on Thursday’s Market Day Report to provide an update on the effort. He says farmers along the route have emphasized the importance of stable, long-term export relationships and the need to reduce trade policy uncertainty.

In his interview with RFD-TV News, Kuehl also reaffirmed the importance of maintaining the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), noting that disruptions could threaten key partnerships with two of America’s largest agricultural trading partners.

Looking ahead, the group hopes to see bipartisan action to strengthen export promotion programs and open new market opportunities for U.S. products abroad.

Talking Tariffs: “Farmers are Really Getting Squeezed’ on Inputs

Tariffs are one issue top of mind for Farmers for Free Trade as they travel through Rural America. According to Kuehl, they have heard from farmers across the United States who say President Donald Trump’s new trade policy is making inputs more expensive, and warn that disaster is brewing.

“Agriculture is a low-margin business,” explained Brian Kuehl with Farmers for Free Trade. " We have very high expenses — everything from tractor parts, to farm chemicals, to the steel and aluminum that go into grain bins — those are imported products or they contain imported products. And that means tariffs drive up the cost of inputs. So as a result, farmers are really getting squeezed. They have very high input costs. Tariffs have also had an impact on how farmers are buying fertilizer and commodity prices. And that’s a recipe for disaster.”

Data from North Dakota State University shows that between April and now, nitrogen imports from tariff-impacted nations have fallen by 24 percent. During the same time, imports from zero-tariff countries rose 44 percent.

Researchers found that fertilizer imports from Russia have also increased, primarily because they are not subject to additional duties. They warn that this is a risky move given the region’s uncertainty.

Related Stories
Early Cattle-on-Feed estimates point to slightly tighter cattle supplies, reinforcing the need to monitor prices and timing for winter marketing.
Removing the 40% duty sharply lowers U.S. beef import costs on beef, coffee, fertilizer and fruit, and restores Brazil’s competitiveness during a period of tight domestic supply.
Row crop losses in 2025 are outpacing last year. With no disaster aid yet approved, many operations face a tough financial bridge to 2026 even as Farm Bill improvements remain a year away.
Experts say farmers and ethanol producers would benefit from a risk-based ILUC system that protects forests without relying on speculative modeling.
CattleCon 2026 kicks off February 3 in Nashville. Kristin Torres with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association joined RFD-TV to share more about what’s ahead at this year’s event.
Elizabeth Strom of the American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers joined RFD-TV to provide the latest perspective on post-harvest business planning and cropland markets in the Midwest.
Dalton Henry, with U.S. Wheat Associates, joined RFD-TV to provide insight on what the pending trade frameworks may mean for American wheat growers.
Mary-Thomas Hart, with the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, discusses the latest WOTUS developments and their implications for agriculture.
Only properly documented, unexhausted fertilizer applied by prior owners may qualify for Section 180 expensing; broader nutrient-based claims carry significant legal and tax risk.