LUBBOCK, Texas (RFD-TV) — U.S. beef processors are navigating the tightest cattle supplies in decades, but Cargill says it has no plans to close any primary beef plants even as Tyson prepares to shut Lexington, Nebraska, and scale back Amarillo.
For producers, this signals widening differences in how major packers are responding to shrinking cattle numbers, rising procurement costs, and restricted imports from Mexico due to New World Screwworm controls.
Cargill confirmed it will continue operating all eight of its North American slaughter plants and is investing in modernization, including a $90 million upgrade at its Fort Morgan, Colorado, facility. The stance contrasts sharply with Tyson’s expected 7 percent national capacity reduction, which will narrow competitive bids in parts of Nebraska, Kansas, and the Texas Panhandle.
Other packers remain stable: JBS and National Beef report no pending closures, and several regional plants built after the pandemic continue running, though some operate below intended throughput. Looking ahead, tight feeder supplies may still pressure margins across plants through 2026.
Farm-Level Takeaway: Cargill’s commitment to keep plants open helps preserve competition as Tyson removes capacity amid historically tight cattle supplies.
Tony St. James, RFD-TV Markets Specialist
Accessing land is one of the biggest challenges facing the next generation of farmers and ranchers.
The behind-the-scenes role helps guide jump crews as they protect rural communities.
Each spring, students from across Crawford County visit Arnold Family Farm for an annual u-pick strawberry festival that connects kids with agriculture.
Federal officials are signaling a more aggressive push on beef packer concentration, but any direct market impact will depend on what the investigation actually finds.
The court’s decision to deny the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert’s testimony serves as a sharp reminder of the high burden required to exclude expert testimony, particularly in the agricultural context, where “experience” is often the currency of reliability.
The USDA’s annual report leaves dairy producers with a mixed picture. Output and herd size expanded, but weaker prices kept income from rising with production.
