SNAP Improves Food Security Less Than Surveys Suggest

A new USDA analysis found many SNAP participants did not report receiving benefits in federal surveys.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (RFD News) — Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) improves household food security, but Federal surveys may overstate the size of that benefit by as much as 50 percent because many participants do not report receiving assistance.

USDA’s Economic Research Service compared survey responses with administrative records from 19 States for 2017 through 2019. The linked records showed that 47.3 percent of SNAP participants incorrectly reported not receiving benefits.

Using survey responses alone suggested SNAP improved food security by 38.4 percent. When researchers included administrative participation records, the estimated improvement fell to 24.4 percent. The program still produced a meaningful gain, but the effect was smaller than survey data indicated.

The findings could change how policymakers measure hunger, poverty, and nutrition program performance. Incomplete participation data may also give an inaccurate picture of the households receiving assistance and the results those benefits produce.

Researchers say combining protected administrative records with Federal surveys can provide more reliable estimates. Better data could improve future program evaluations and help guide food assistance policy.

Farm-Level Takeaway: More accurate SNAP records can improve decisions affecting food access and rural household stability.

Tony St. James, RFD News Markets Specialist
Tony St. James joined the RFD-TV talent team in August 2024, bringing a wealth of experience and a fresh perspective to RFD-TV and Rural Radio Channel 147 Sirius XM. In addition to his role as Market Specialist (collaborating with Scott “The Cow Guy” Shellady to provide radio and TV audiences with the latest updates on ag commodity markets), he hosts “Rural America Live” and serves as talent for trade shows.

LATEST STORIES BY THIS AUTHOR:

The special provision giving producers the higher of ARC or PLC for 2025 will not continue next year.
Higher shipping costs could make U.S. grain less competitive overseas.
Higher heating costs are putting added pressure on household budgets in rural communities.
The planned UAE facility could create a new annual export outlet for American corn growers.
Slower exports and stronger foreign competition are weighing on the U.S. pork sector.
AFBF Deputy Chief Economist Dr. Faith Parum says Title I commodity payment rates are expected in November. Producers should watch for USDA application details and contact local FSA offices.
More soybeans are being processed domestically as renewable fuels drive demand for soybean oil.
USDA’s new regional cattle report could give producers a clearer view of cash prices as negotiated trade continues to shrink.
Countries that buy American cotton could receive favorable tariff treatment on qualifying apparel.
Wheat remains closest to triggering a PLC payment as producers approach the December election deadline.
New and expanded rail lines could give Brazilian soybean and corn exports a stronger cost advantage.
Barge traffic improved, but grain movement continues to face higher transportation costs during harvest.